Everybody Draws Mohammed Day

Dare-to-wear t-shirt

They say fashion is a statement; a fashion statement, they say. So, while the French designers are carefully crafting the burka into some sort of acceptable symbol of Islamic supremacy, others are seeking to ban it for it is a symbol of Islamic supremacy and myths-guided, 7th century notions of Islamic supremacy is not acceptable.

Meanwhile, there’s a drawer full of t-shirts to wear.

"Palestinian" perfidy

"Palestinians" never go to war without their human shields

It might be you’ve never noticed or were aware that the photo is a typical scene in areas that have been Palestinianized. The gunman makes certain to always use “civilians” and the “civilians” always make sure to provide cover for the gunman.

These “civilians” thus endanger themselves purposefully by being present when the IDF directs return fire to this location. There is a great probability that some of these “civilians” will be killed. Photos will be taken and accusations of “war crimes” will be made against Israel.

However, the actual War Crime committed here is that of perfidy and it is the “Palestinian” way. Those responsible for said perfidy also bear the responsibility for all injuries and/or deaths that occur. That party would be the “Palestinians,” be they Hamas, al Fatah, take your pick.

Furthermore, those responsible for actual War Crimes, as the “Palestinians” certainly are, according to the Geneva Convention, are not protected by the Geneva Convention. Recall these conventions were created as rules of warfare that specifically safeguarded civilians.

When “Palestinian” “civilians” play their perfidous role, they stray strut dangerously over the line and become accomplices. (Speaking of accomplices, Atlas Shrugs has a great series on the Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, and his deep Nazi connections. Don’t forget the Mufti was the “father” of “Palestinianism” and the Nazis had a great affinity for Islam.)

I used to be surprised but they love death and taunt us with the fact that we love life. As if that’s an actual taunt. It’s more an admission that the free world is dealing with a mindset that hardly uses its mind and is rather set about it.

Israel's peculiar position

The following I pulled from Dreaming of Moshiach:

The following article was written in 1968, 41 years ago by Eric Hoffer (1902-1983). He was a non-Jewish American longshoreman who turned into a social philosopher, wrote columns for newspapers and nine books and was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

by Eric Hoffer – LA Times 5/26/68

The Jews are a peculiar people: things permitted to other nations are forbidden to the Jews. Other nations drive out thousands, even millions of people and there is no refugee problem. Russia did it, Poland and Czechoslovakia did it. Turkey threw out a million Greeks, and Algeria a million Frenchman. Indonesia threw out heaven knows how many Chinese and no one says a word about refugees. But in the case of Israel , the displaced Arabs have become eternal refugees.

Everyone insists that Israel must take back every single one. Arnold Toynbee calls the displacement of the Arabs an atrocity greater than any committed by the Nazis. Other nations when victorious on the battlefield dictate peace terms. But when Israel is victorious, it must sue for peace.

Everyone expects the Jews to be the only real Christians in this world. Other nations, when they are defeated, survive and recover but should Israel be defeated it would be destroyed. Had Nasser triumphed last June [1967], he would have wiped Israel off the map, and no one would have lifted a finger to save the Jews.

No commitment to the Jews by any government, including our own, is worth the paper it is written on.

There is a cry of outrage all over the world when people die in Vietnam or when two Blacks are executed in Rhodesia. But, when Hitler slaughtered Jews no one demonstrated against him. The Swedes, who were ready to break off diplomatic relations with America because of what we did in Vietnam, did not let out a peep when Hitler was slaughtering Jews. They sent Hitler choice iron ore, and ball bearings, and serviced his troops in Norway.

The Jews are alone in the world.

If Israel survives, it will be solely because of Jewish efforts and Jewish resources. Yet at this moment, Israel is our only reliable and unconditional ally. We can rely more on Israel than Israel can rely on us. And one has only to imagine what would have happened last summer [1967] had the Arabs and their Russian backers won the war, to realize how vital the survival of Israel is to America and the West in general.

I have a premonition that will not leave me; as it goes with Israel so will it go with all of us. Should Israel perish, the Holocaust will be upon us all.

Artists for the "elimination of the Zionist entity," er, ?alestinian "rights"

Haj Amin Al-Husseini, the Mufti of Jerusalem and father of the ?alestinian movement, and associate Adolf Hitler in Berlin during WWII.

I find things like the following helpful for making decisions as to who I hire for entertainment purposes. For instance, I used to like David Byrne, but now, not so much. Antisemites come in many shapes and styles. Some are genuinely proud while others think they have a moral stance which they think means they’re not antisemites.

The benefit of the doubt would be to suggest folks like David Byrne have no idea that ?alestinianism shares ideological roots with Nazism and is fueled by the tenets of !slam’s intolerance of tolerance. Therefore, he’s an ignorant, antisemitic fool who would be shocked to be called an antisemite. If he does know the ideological roots of ?alestinianism and still agrees with it, then all doubt is removed: David Byrne would be an antisemite. Clearly though, he’s probably only anti-“Zionist” as he most likely has a disconnect where Jews live: Zion.

Obama's promise of transparency fulfilled

If you were in charge of the very thing you hated, would you see to it’s continued success when that success is what you hate most about it?

Everyone wonders about the promised transparency of Obama’s administration. They think the obsfucation and high-speed efforts to pass bills before they’re even read as Obama somehow covering up something; that he’s not so transparent. Oh p’shaw!

As an old friend used to say, and I’ll apply it to Obama, “He’s as transparent as a glass of water and twice as easy to see through.” Given who Obama is, was mentored by, was raised and nourished by, was employed by, was financed by, the only ones who don’t see through Obama are the ones that don’t want to; they want mystery and maybe something to mull over and over, never to arrive at a concrete conclusion on. Obama wasn’t schooled to love America. He wasn’t even schooled to respect America.

So, what does one who hates the entity he campaigned to “change” do to it? Does he respect the traditions of the office? Does he respect the traditional allies of the nation? Does he respect the people he was hired to govern?

I would argue that given the man Obama is, it is a grave mistake to measure him by any other means. He doesn’t want the economy to succeed for he prefers it didn’t. Really, would any self-respecting Marxist enact policies that prove the free market’s superiority or would he wreak havoc from within?

Obama is doing just what he was programmed (Alinsky, Ayers, Cone, Wright, Marshall, ACORN, Annenburg Challenge, Senate voting record…) to do: destroy the America he hates and the “white man” who built that hateful America thing he hates. View Obama with this in mind and everything he’s doing makes complete sense. The White House is thrilled with the tanking trend of the United States of America as Obama tries to bring her to her knees, just as low as he bowed before the Saudi king.

Hey Obama, who was the Grand Mufti, Haj Muhammed Amin al-Husseini?

Does Obama know or care who the true father of ?alestinianism was? (from Mark Levin’s radio show of June 4, 2009)

Who was the Grand Mufti, Haj Muhammed Amin al-Husseini?

Muhammed Amin al-Husseini [many spelling variations] was born in 1893 (or 1895), the son of the Mufti of Jerusalem and member of an esteemed, aristocratic family. The Husseinis were one of the richest and most powerful of all the rivalling clans in the Ottoman province known as the Judaean part of Palestine.

Amin al-Husseini studied religious law at al-Azhar University, Cairo, and attended the Istanbul School of Administration. In 1913 he went to Mecca on a pilgrimage, earning the honorary title of “Haj”. He voluntarily joined the Ottoman Turkish army in World War I but returned to Jerusalem in 1917 and expediently switched sides to aid the victorious British. He acquired the reputation as a violent, fanatical anti-Zionist zealot and was jailed by the British for instigating a 1920 Arab attack against Jews who were praying at the Western Wall.

New anonymous posters

A bunch more Obama posters have arrived and are now posted.

Ahmadinejad – Obama debate would expose similar views, not differences

Ahmadinejad and Obama. Would they hug or clasp hands? Would their arguments differ greatly? Would Obama recognize the awkwardness of using the same talking points as Ahmadinejad? Would Ahmadinejad stand idly by while Obama steals his thunder, over and over again? Anyhow, Ahmadinejad offers to debate Obama.

As I invited the US president to a debate in (my address to) the United Nations during my visit to New York in the past, I repeat my call for a debate (with the US president) to study the root causes of global problems and management and collective participation in (the establishment of) sustainable security and peace,” Ahmadinejad told foreign reporters in a press conference at the presidential office here in Tehran today.

Obama finds money for the enemies of freedom

In a world where facts don’t matter for the Left when they seem dismissive of them, it would also seem that facts do matter to the Left when they perform acrobatics to avoid them. As some are still trying to figure out Obama, by viewing him incorrectly through the prism of normalcy, his spending choices speak volumes about his interests, priorities and ideology.

In what world view does it make sense for free people to pay the enemies of freedom … anything? As the rep for the free peoples of the world, Obama seems to have a fancy for those the very ones working night and day against freedom. Is the smartest man the universe has ever seen that profoundly stupid or are those that support him equally so historically, ideologically and morally retarded?

The following from Creeping Sharia:

Barack Obama’s 2009 Supplemental Appropriations for Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Pandemic Flu was revised and “passed by the full committee”. Not sure what the next step is, but based on the summary, it gives billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to countries and entities that support sharia law and/or harbor, hide and support those who want to destroy the U.S. and our allies.

Read the summary from David Obey’s office that was quietly released last week with nary a word from any media.

• $3.6 billion, matching the request, to expand and improve capabilities of the Afghan security forces

• $400 million, as requested, to build the counterinsurgency capabilities of the Pakistani security forces

• Afghanistan: $1.52 billion, $86 million above the request

• West Bank and Gaza: $665 million in bilateral economic, humanitarian, and security assistance for the West Bank and Gaza