"Palestinian" perfidy

"Palestinians" never go to war without their human shields

It might be you’ve never noticed or were aware that the photo is a typical scene in areas that have been Palestinianized. The gunman makes certain to always use “civilians” and the “civilians” always make sure to provide cover for the gunman.

These “civilians” thus endanger themselves purposefully by being present when the IDF directs return fire to this location. There is a great probability that some of these “civilians” will be killed. Photos will be taken and accusations of “war crimes” will be made against Israel.

However, the actual War Crime committed here is that of perfidy and it is the “Palestinian” way. Those responsible for said perfidy also bear the responsibility for all injuries and/or deaths that occur. That party would be the “Palestinians,” be they Hamas, al Fatah, take your pick.

Furthermore, those responsible for actual War Crimes, as the “Palestinians” certainly are, according to the Geneva Convention, are not protected by the Geneva Convention. Recall these conventions were created as rules of warfare that specifically safeguarded civilians.

When “Palestinian” “civilians” play their perfidous role, they stray strut dangerously over the line and become accomplices. (Speaking of accomplices, Atlas Shrugs has a great series on the Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, and his deep Nazi connections. Don’t forget the Mufti was the “father” of “Palestinianism” and the Nazis had a great affinity for Islam.)

I used to be surprised but they love death and taunt us with the fact that we love life. As if that’s an actual taunt. It’s more an admission that the free world is dealing with a mindset that hardly uses its mind and is rather set about it.

Artists for the "elimination of the Zionist entity," er, ?alestinian "rights"

Haj Amin Al-Husseini, the Mufti of Jerusalem and father of the ?alestinian movement, and associate Adolf Hitler in Berlin during WWII.

I find things like the following helpful for making decisions as to who I hire for entertainment purposes. For instance, I used to like David Byrne, but now, not so much. Antisemites come in many shapes and styles. Some are genuinely proud while others think they have a moral stance which they think means they’re not antisemites.

The benefit of the doubt would be to suggest folks like David Byrne have no idea that ?alestinianism shares ideological roots with Nazism and is fueled by the tenets of !slam’s intolerance of tolerance. Therefore, he’s an ignorant, antisemitic fool who would be shocked to be called an antisemite. If he does know the ideological roots of ?alestinianism and still agrees with it, then all doubt is removed: David Byrne would be an antisemite. Clearly though, he’s probably only anti-“Zionist” as he most likely has a disconnect where Jews live: Zion.

Obama's promise of transparency fulfilled

If you were in charge of the very thing you hated, would you see to it’s continued success when that success is what you hate most about it?

Everyone wonders about the promised transparency of Obama’s administration. They think the obsfucation and high-speed efforts to pass bills before they’re even read as Obama somehow covering up something; that he’s not so transparent. Oh p’shaw!

As an old friend used to say, and I’ll apply it to Obama, “He’s as transparent as a glass of water and twice as easy to see through.” Given who Obama is, was mentored by, was raised and nourished by, was employed by, was financed by, the only ones who don’t see through Obama are the ones that don’t want to; they want mystery and maybe something to mull over and over, never to arrive at a concrete conclusion on. Obama wasn’t schooled to love America. He wasn’t even schooled to respect America.

So, what does one who hates the entity he campaigned to “change” do to it? Does he respect the traditions of the office? Does he respect the traditional allies of the nation? Does he respect the people he was hired to govern?

I would argue that given the man Obama is, it is a grave mistake to measure him by any other means. He doesn’t want the economy to succeed for he prefers it didn’t. Really, would any self-respecting Marxist enact policies that prove the free market’s superiority or would he wreak havoc from within?

Obama is doing just what he was programmed (Alinsky, Ayers, Cone, Wright, Marshall, ACORN, Annenburg Challenge, Senate voting record…) to do: destroy the America he hates and the “white man” who built that hateful America thing he hates. View Obama with this in mind and everything he’s doing makes complete sense. The White House is thrilled with the tanking trend of the United States of America as Obama tries to bring her to her knees, just as low as he bowed before the Saudi king.

It's the objective, stupid

?alestinians share the idea of peace equating with a land free of Jews. It’s not difficult to understand this culture once one absorbs the fact that Mein Kampf is a bestseller, as far as bestsellers in the areas controlled by ?alestinianism goes and the legacy of Nazi-like-mindedness is not out of sorts with the culture either.

As Itamar Marcus and Barbara Crook constantly reveal, ?alestinian culture is intentionally diabolical.

A Hamas cleric who once participated in an international conference of “Imams and Rabbis for Peace” — whose delegates vowed to “condemn any negative representation” of each other’s religions — has wholeheartedly espoused Hamas’s racist ideology in a recent Friday sermon on Hamas TV.

And this, from a sermon given Hamas TV [Hamas (Al-Aqsa) TV, April 3, 2009]

We, the Muslims, know the nature of Jews the best, because the Holy Quran taught us. The prophetic traditions explained at length to Muslims the true nature of Jews… Their war and their hatred for Muhammad and Islam is in their souls, they are naturally disposed to it.

Israel today lives in the heart of Arab-Muslim territory, and it is a cancer that wants to rule the world. Know, my brothers! The Jews’ expansion today brings the dissemination of an ancient thinking…

Obama is shifting political winds in ugly direction

What could Obama possibly have meant with the following admission?

In the wake of 9/11, my meetings with Arab and Pakistani Americans have a more urgent quality, for the stories of detentions and FBI questioning and hard stares from neighbors have shaken their sense of security and belonging. I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.

Given that Obama’s first international act as President was to call Mahmoud Abbas aka Abu Mazen, the PLO’s financier of the ’72 Munich Olympic massacre of Israeli athletes and Arafat’s right hand man for 40 years, it’s easy to feel the political winds change.

PLO Charter Article 23 activated against Sweden

The MSN didn’t pick up much of the story of the Israeli tennis team playing a Davis Cup match in Sweden recently. In short, mobs of Muzzlems rioted outside the stadium and clashed with police; public viewing of the matches was cancelled and the Israelis won after all.

To me, it was another example of PLO Charter Article 23 being deployed, or activated, quite easily, under the weakness of mercy of multiculturalism. The real disservice of multiculturalism means free nations must adopt the mindlessness of the “other” instead of the “other” adopting the openness of the free nations that freely invited them to enjoy their freedom.

CAIR #5: ?alestinians

CAIR always speaks the truth and this time I’ve matched their form with the word. It may be alarming for the free whirled and what satire isn’t uncomfortable for an ideology that officially frowns on laughter and jokes?

PLO Charter, Article 23 comes to life

?alestinians around the whirled are apoplectic, enraged, foaming over the deaths of (hopefully) 300+ Hamas fighters out of the estimated 20,000 happy-go-trigger-happy jihadis, calling the IDFs actions “genocide.” I’ve heard this from the lips of Arab Muzzlem businessmen here in Dar al-Harb. What I’ve tried to point out for a long time is now coming to pass.

PLO Charter, 1968

THE PALESTINIAN NATIONAL CHARTER:

Resolutions of the Palestine National Council, July 1-17, 1968

Article 1: Palestine is the homeland of the Arab Palestinian people; it is an indivisible part of the Arab homeland, and the Palestinian people are an integral part of the Arab nation.

Article 2: Palestine, with the boundaries it had during the British Mandate, is an indivisible territorial unit.

Article 3: The Palestinian Arab people possess the legal right to their homeland and have the right to determine their destiny after achieving the liberation of their country in accordance with their wishes and entirely of their own accord and will.